Statistisches Bundesamt

12.9k citations
902 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Statistisches Bundesamt

677 papers receiving 10.6k citations

Peers

Statistisches Bundesamt
Comparison fields: 5 of 222
  • Gastroenterology 566
  • Family Practice 117
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 395
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.2k
  • Oncology 934
Replace Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care with:
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care Germany
Flevoziekenhuis Netherlands
Centre d’Investigation Clinique Innovation Technologique de Nancy France
Sygehus Sønderjylland Denmark
Novartis (France) France
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Netherlands
VieCuri Medisch Centrum Netherlands
Tergooi Netherlands
Imelda Hospital Belgium
Groene Hart Ziekenhuis Netherlands
Statistisches Bundesamt relative to Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care Germany Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Statistisches Bundesamt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Statistisches Bundesamt. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Statistisches Bundesamt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Statistisches Bundesamt more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Statistisches Bundesamt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Statistisches Bundesamt at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Statistisches Bundesamt at the time of their publication.

About Statistisches Bundesamt

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Statistisches Bundesamt have published 902 papers, which have received a total of 12.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 58 papers in Statistics and Probability, 93 papers in General Health Professions, 27 papers in Small Animals, 98 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 30 papers in Finance on the topics of Health and Medical Studies (49 papers), German Economic Analysis & Policies (24 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (21 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (16 papers), Probability and Statistical Research (16 papers), European Monetary and Fiscal Policies (16 papers), demographic modeling and climate adaptation (15 papers) and Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Gastroenterology (566 citations), Family Practice (117 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (395 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.2k citations) and Oncology (934 citations). Authors at Statistisches Bundesamt collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and Switzerland and have published in prestigious journals including Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Review of Income and Wealth, BMC Cancer, Clinical Chemistry and PLoS ONE. Some of Statistisches Bundesamt's most productive authors include Carsten Stahmer, Gudrun Bernhard, Volker F. Eckardt, Thomas Keller, Peter Klein, Carsten Schwenke, Steffen Osterloh, Holger Patzelt, Anja Klaukien and Roland Schoop.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact