Statistisches Bundesamt

13.1k citations
829 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Statistisches Bundesamt

630 papers receiving 10.5k citations

Peers

Statistisches Bundesamt
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
  • Gastroenterology 593
  • Family Practice 120
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 396
  • Oncology 1.2k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.3k
Replace European Medicines Agency with:
European Medicines Agency Netherlands
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care Germany
Flevoziekenhuis Netherlands
Tergooi Netherlands
Sygehus Sønderjylland Denmark
VieCuri Medisch Centrum Netherlands
Data Management (Italy) Italy
Kolding Hospital Denmark
Richard Wolf (Germany) Germany
Geneeskundige en Gezondheidsdienst Netherlands
Statistisches Bundesamt relative to European Medicines Agency Netherlands European Medicines Agency's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
European Medicines Agency · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Statistisches Bundesamt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Statistisches Bundesamt. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Statistisches Bundesamt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Statistisches Bundesamt more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Statistisches Bundesamt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Statistisches Bundesamt at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Statistisches Bundesamt at the time of their publication.

About Statistisches Bundesamt

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Statistisches Bundesamt have published 829 papers, which have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 57 papers in Statistics and Probability, 27 papers in Small Animals, 84 papers in General Health Professions, 82 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 25 papers in Finance on the topics of Health and Medical Studies (47 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (21 papers), German Economic Analysis & Policies (20 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (16 papers), Probability and Statistical Research (15 papers), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (15 papers), Global Health Care Issues (15 papers) and European Monetary and Fiscal Policies (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Gastroenterology (593 citations), Family Practice (120 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (396 citations), Oncology (1.2k citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.3k citations). Authors at Statistisches Bundesamt collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and Switzerland and have published in prestigious journals including Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Clinical Chemistry, Review of Income and Wealth, Journal of Clinical Medicine and PLoS ONE. Some of Statistisches Bundesamt's most productive authors include Carsten Stahmer, Gudrun Bernhard, Volker F. Eckardt, Thomas M. Keller, Peter Klein, Carsten Schwenke, Roland Schoop, Holger Patzelt, Anja Klaukien and Helmut Küchenhoff.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact