D. E. Shaw Research

48.7k citations
322 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

D. E. Shaw Research

314 papers receiving 48.5k citations

Peers

D. E. Shaw Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 190
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 8.8k
  • Molecular Biology 25.3k
  • Hardware and Architecture 1.6k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 1.9k
  • Oncology 1.8k
Replace Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center with:
Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center United States
Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Chemical Biology United States
Argonne Leadership Computing Facility
Albany Molecular Research (United States) United States
Sarepta Therapeutics (United States) United States
The Gordon Life Science Institute United States
Ohio Supercomputer Center United States
ARIAD Pharmaceuticals (United States) United States
Thomson Reuters (United States) United States
Elizabeth City State University United States
D. E. Shaw Research relative to Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center United States Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×35.3×
Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at D. E. Shaw Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at D. E. Shaw Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at D. E. Shaw Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. E. Shaw Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at D. E. Shaw Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with D. E. Shaw Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with D. E. Shaw Research at the time of their publication.

About D. E. Shaw Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with D. E. Shaw Research have published 322 papers, which have received a total of 48.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 40 papers in Hardware and Architecture, 132 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Structural Biology, 22 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 27 papers in Computer Networks and Communications on the topics of Protein Structure and Dynamics (59 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (37 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (23 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (12 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (11 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (11 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (10 papers) and Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computational Theory and Mathematics (8.8k citations), Molecular Biology (25.3k citations), Hardware and Architecture (1.6k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (1.9k citations) and Oncology (1.8k citations). Authors at D. E. Shaw Research collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Biophysical Journal, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory and Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. Some of D. E. Shaw Research's most productive authors include David Elliot Shaw, Ron O. Dror, Stefano Piana, Kresten Lindorff‐Larsen, Paul Maragakis, John L. Klepeis, Yibing Shan, Michael P. Eastwood, Kim Palmö and Richard A. Friesner.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact