Stanford Cardiovascular Institute

65.1k citations
1.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Stanford Cardiovascular Institute

1.2k papers receiving 55.0k citations

Peers

Stanford Cardiovascular Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 11.5k
  • Molecular Biology 25.6k
  • Biomaterials 4.9k
  • Biomedical Engineering 12.3k
  • Surgery 10.9k
Replace Roche (United States) with:
Roche (United States) United States
Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute United States
UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center United States
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine United States
Creative Research Enterprises (United States) United States
Institute for Molecular Medicine United States
Saint John's Health Center United States
Children's Hospital of Orange County United States
Mattel Children's Hospital United States
Huntington Hospital United States
Stanford Cardiovascular Institute relative to Roche (United States) United States Roche (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
Roche (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Stanford Cardiovascular Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Stanford Cardiovascular Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Stanford Cardiovascular Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stanford Cardiovascular Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Stanford Cardiovascular Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Stanford Cardiovascular Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Stanford Cardiovascular Institute at the time of their publication.

About Stanford Cardiovascular Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Stanford Cardiovascular Institute have published 1.5k papers, which have received a total of 65.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 325 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 591 papers in Molecular Biology, 269 papers in Surgery, 76 papers in Biomaterials and 140 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine on the topics of Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (193 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (110 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (105 papers), Congenital heart defects research (95 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (95 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (76 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (74 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (67 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (11.5k citations), Molecular Biology (25.6k citations), Biomaterials (4.9k citations), Biomedical Engineering (12.3k citations) and Surgery (10.9k citations). Authors at Stanford Cardiovascular Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Stem Cell Research, Circulation Research, Circulation, Scientific Reports and Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Some of Stanford Cardiovascular Institute's most productive authors include Joseph Wu, Ebrahim Mostafavi, Paul W. Burridge, Beth L. Pruitt, Ngan Fong Huang, Erik Ingelsson, Morteza Mahmoudi, François Haddad, Vahid Serpooshan and Elena Matsa.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact