California Institute for Regenerative Medicine

226.6k citations
3.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

California Institute for Regenerative Medicine

2.8k papers receiving 204.4k citations

Peers

California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Developmental Neuroscience 8.3k
  • Cancer Research 24.2k
  • Molecular Biology 109.0k
  • Genetics 15.8k
  • Immunology 25.8k
Replace Gladstone Institutes with:
Gladstone Institutes United States
Cellular Research (United States) United States
Broad Center United States
Discovery Institute United States
La Jolla Bioengineering Institute United States
Roche (United States) United States
Fairchild Semiconductor (United States) United States
Saban Research Institute United States
Stanford Cardiovascular Institute United States
Translational Genomics Research Institute United States
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine relative to Gladstone Institutes United States Gladstone Institutes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gladstone Institutes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at California Institute for Regenerative Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at California Institute for Regenerative Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites California Institute for Regenerative Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at California Institute for Regenerative Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with California Institute for Regenerative Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with California Institute for Regenerative Medicine at the time of their publication.

About California Institute for Regenerative Medicine

In recent decades, authors affiliated with California Institute for Regenerative Medicine have published 3.1k papers, which have received a total of 226.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 131 papers in Developmental Neuroscience, 255 papers in Genetics, 1.6k papers in Molecular Biology, 173 papers in Hematology and 210 papers in Cancer Research on the topics of Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (489 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (291 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (198 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (184 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (169 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (150 papers), Renal and related cancers (128 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (122 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental Neuroscience (8.3k citations), Cancer Research (24.2k citations), Molecular Biology (109.0k citations), Genetics (15.8k citations) and Immunology (25.8k citations). Authors at California Institute for Regenerative Medicine collaborate with scholars in United States, India and China and have published in prestigious journals including Nature Communications, Cell stem cell, Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Blood. Some of California Institute for Regenerative Medicine's most productive authors include Irving L. Weissman, Aaron M. Newman, Arash Ash Alizadeh, Chih Long Liu, Michael Thornton Longaker, Charles E. Murry, Maximilian Diehn, Valerie Marie Weaver, Geoffrey C. Gurtner and Andrew J. Gentles.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact