New York Stem Cell Foundation

17.9k citations
373 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

New York Stem Cell Foundation

337 papers receiving 16.8k citations

Peers

New York Stem Cell Foundation
Comparison fields: 5 of 182
  • Developmental Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Aging 410
  • Molecular Biology 10.0k
  • Neurology 1.0k
  • Genetics 1.2k
Replace Rosetta Stone (United States) with:
Rosetta Stone (United States) United States
Cell Signaling Technology (United States) United States
W. Alton Jones Cell Science Center United States
Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT United States
Rockefeller University Hospital United States
Angiogenesis Foundation United States
Longevity Biotech (United States) United States
Idera Pharmaceuticals (United States) United States
Psychogenics (United States) United States
Repligen (United States) United States
New York Stem Cell Foundation relative to Rosetta Stone (United States) United States Rosetta Stone (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Rosetta Stone (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at New York Stem Cell Foundation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at New York Stem Cell Foundation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at New York Stem Cell Foundation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New York Stem Cell Foundation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at New York Stem Cell Foundation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with New York Stem Cell Foundation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with New York Stem Cell Foundation at the time of their publication.

About New York Stem Cell Foundation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with New York Stem Cell Foundation have published 373 papers, which have received a total of 17.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 30 papers in Developmental Neuroscience, 7 papers in Aging, 233 papers in Molecular Biology, 24 papers in Neurology and 19 papers in Ophthalmology on the topics of Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (116 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (73 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (35 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (30 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (26 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (24 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (22 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (22 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Aging (410 citations), Molecular Biology (10.0k citations), Neurology (1.0k citations) and Genetics (1.2k citations). Authors at New York Stem Cell Foundation collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Israel and have published in prestigious journals including Stem Cell Research, Stem Cell Reports, Cell Reports, Cell stem cell and Nature Communications. Some of New York Stem Cell Foundation's most productive authors include Gordon Keller, Simón Méndez‐Ferrer, Daniel Lucas, Paul S. Frenette, Michela Battista, Valentina Fossati, Scott Noggle, Steven Kattman, Tara L. Huber and Dieter Egli.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact