California State University, San Marcos
Impact in
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 50
- Top scholars
- P. Wesley SchultzAlison KingBruce Louis RichVictoria J. FabryJeffery A. LePineEean CrawfordRichard A. FeelyRajnandini Pillai
- Journals
- The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (26 papers)Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (25 papers)PLoS ONE (24 papers)Journal of Phycology (16 papers)Nicotine & Tobacco Research (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaBrazil
In The Last Decade
California State University, San Marcos
2.6k papers receiving 101.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 246
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 10.1k
- Applied Psychology 4.1k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 10.3k
- Marketing 6.8k
- Social Psychology 12.8k
Countries citing scholars working at California State University, San Marcos
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at California State University, San Marcos. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at California State University, San Marcos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites California State University, San Marcos more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at California State University, San Marcos
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with California State University, San Marcos at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with California State University, San Marcos at the time of their publication.
About California State University, San Marcos
In recent decades, authors affiliated with California State University, San Marcos have published 3.0k papers, which have received a total of 107.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 41 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 65 papers in Applied Psychology, 264 papers in Social Psychology, 97 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine and 93 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine on the topics of Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (94 papers), Sports Performance and Training (84 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (67 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (66 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (64 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (63 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (51 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (50 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (10.1k citations), Applied Psychology (4.1k citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (10.3k citations), Marketing (6.8k citations) and Social Psychology (12.8k citations). Authors at California State University, San Marcos collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, PLoS ONE, Journal of Phycology and Nicotine & Tobacco Research. Some of California State University, San Marcos's most productive authors include P. Wesley Schultz, Alison King, Bruce Louis Rich, Victoria J. Fabry, Jeffery A. LePine, Eean Crawford, Richard A. Feely, Rajnandini Pillai, Todd A. Astorino and Robert B. Cialdini.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.