Central Silk Technological Research Institute
Impact in
- Insect Science top 10%
- Silkworms and Sericulture Research
- Insect Utilization and Effects
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
-
- Silk-based biomaterials and applications
Papers in
- Insect Science 232
- Silkworms and Sericulture Research 189
- Insect Utilization and Effects 50
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 35
- Biomaterials 98
- Silk-based biomaterials and applications 95
- Top scholars
- K. VijayanJavaregowda NagarajuS. N. ChatterjeePrem Prakash SrivastavaNaveen V. PadakiB. SaratchandraS. Raje UrsK. Thangavelu
- Journals
- Journal of the Textile Institute (12 papers)Molecular Biology Reports (5 papers)Journal of Insect Science (4 papers)Journal of Applied Polymer Science (4 papers)Biochemical Genetics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Central Silk Technological Research Institute
339 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
- Insect Science 1.5k
- Biomaterials 664
- Plant Science 1.0k
- Genetics 642
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 360
Countries citing scholars working at Central Silk Technological Research Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Central Silk Technological Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Central Silk Technological Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Central Silk Technological Research Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Central Silk Technological Research Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Central Silk Technological Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Central Silk Technological Research Institute at the time of their publication.
About Central Silk Technological Research Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Central Silk Technological Research Institute have published 411 papers, which have received a total of 3.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 232 papers in Insect Science, 98 papers in Biomaterials, 73 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 111 papers in Plant Science and 31 papers in Polymers and Plastics on the topics of Silkworms and Sericulture Research (189 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (95 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (50 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (35 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (28 papers), Textile materials and evaluations (22 papers), Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies (22 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Insect Science (1.5k citations), Biomaterials (664 citations), Plant Science (1.0k citations), Genetics (642 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (360 citations). Authors at Central Silk Technological Research Institute collaborate with scholars in India, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the Textile Institute, Molecular Biology Reports, Journal of Insect Science, Journal of Applied Polymer Science and Biochemical Genetics. Some of Central Silk Technological Research Institute's most productive authors include K. Vijayan, Javaregowda Nagaraju, S. N. Chatterjee, Prem Prakash Srivastava, Naveen V. Padaki, B. Saratchandra, S. Raje Urs, K. Thangavelu, B. L. Deopura and A. K. Awasthi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.