Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding
Impact in
-
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
-
- Forest ecology and management
Papers in
- Plant Science 324
- Genetics and Plant Breeding 32
- Seed Germination and Physiology 24
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 24
-
- Forest ecology and management 49
- Top scholars
- Matthias FladungSandeep KumarModhumita Ghosh DasguptaR. YasodhaMalay GhoshRekha R. WarrierM. Gnana PrakashMohan Varghese
- Journals
- Silvae genetica (12 papers)New Forests (8 papers)Journal of Forest Research (8 papers)Tree Genetics & Genomes (8 papers)Hereditas (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding
455 papers receiving 5.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
- Plant Science 3.0k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 656
- Horticulture 45
- Forestry 145
- Endocrinology 168
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding at the time of their publication.
About Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding have published 541 papers, which have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 324 papers in Plant Science, 79 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 22 papers in Forestry, 22 papers in Endocrinology and 58 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics on the topics of Forest ecology and management (49 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (41 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (37 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (32 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (32 papers), Plant and animal studies (25 papers), Seed Germination and Physiology (24 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (24 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Plant Science (3.0k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (656 citations), Horticulture (45 citations), Forestry (145 citations) and Endocrinology (168 citations). Authors at Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding collaborate with scholars in India, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Silvae genetica, New Forests, Journal of Forest Research, Tree Genetics & Genomes and Hereditas. Some of Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding's most productive authors include Matthias Fladung, Sandeep Kumar, Modhumita Ghosh Dasgupta, R. Yasodha, Malay Ghosh, Rekha R. Warrier, M. Gnana Prakash, Mohan Varghese, Birgit Ziegenhagen and Muraleedharan G. Nair.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.