Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute
Impact in
- Insect Science top 10%
- Silkworms and Sericulture Research
- Insect Utilization and Effects
-
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Papers in
- Insect Science 322
- Silkworms and Sericulture Research 287
- Insect Utilization and Effects 64
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 60
- Plant Science 244
- Plant Virus Research Studies 38
- Top scholars
- Monojit MondalGulab Khan RohelaV. Girish NaikR. Κ. DattaSumathy RamasamyB. B. BindrooK. VijayanSajal Chakraborti
- Journals
- Euphytica (6 papers)Scientific Reports (6 papers)Scientia Horticulturae (6 papers)Methods in microbiology (5 papers)Trees (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute
497 papers receiving 5.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
- Insect Science 1.8k
- Plant Science 2.6k
- Biomaterials 723
- Horticulture 25
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 483
Countries citing scholars working at Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute at the time of their publication.
About Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute have published 577 papers, which have received a total of 5.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 322 papers in Insect Science, 244 papers in Plant Science, 77 papers in Biomaterials, 80 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 31 papers in Animal Science and Zoology on the topics of Silkworms and Sericulture Research (287 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (73 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (64 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (60 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (38 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (38 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (36 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (34 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Insect Science (1.8k citations), Plant Science (2.6k citations), Biomaterials (723 citations), Horticulture (25 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (483 citations). Authors at Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute collaborate with scholars in India, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Euphytica, Scientific Reports, Scientia Horticulturae, Methods in microbiology and Trees. Some of Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute's most productive authors include Monojit Mondal, Gulab Khan Rohela, V. Girish Naik, R. Κ. Datta, Sumathy Ramasamy, B. B. Bindroo, K. Vijayan, Sajal Chakraborti, Pawan Shukla and V. Sivaprasad.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.