Manomet Conservation Sciences

12.5k citations
241 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Manomet Conservation Sciences

228 papers receiving 12.5k citations

Peers

Manomet Conservation Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
  • Ecology 3.4k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.4k
  • Ecological Modeling 205
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 373
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.2k
Replace College of the Atlantic with:
College of the Atlantic United States
Gulf of Maine Research Institute United States
Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec Canada
ForestGEO United States
Earth Resources Technology (United States) United States
Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command United States
Spectral Sciences (United States) United States
NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries United States
Center for Coastal Studies United States
Wildlife Conservation Society Canada Canada
Manomet Conservation Sciences relative to College of the Atlantic United States College of the Atlantic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×23.3×
College of the Atlantic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Manomet Conservation Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Manomet Conservation Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Manomet Conservation Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manomet Conservation Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Manomet Conservation Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Manomet Conservation Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Manomet Conservation Sciences at the time of their publication.

About Manomet Conservation Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Manomet Conservation Sciences have published 241 papers, which have received a total of 12.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 114 papers in Ecology, 4 papers in Ecological Modeling, 16 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 25 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 2 papers in Developmental Biology on the topics of Avian ecology and behavior (101 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (9 papers), Forest Management and Policy (8 papers), Forest ecology and management (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers), Marine animal studies overview (7 papers), Marine and fisheries research (7 papers) and Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (7 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology (3.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.4k citations), Ecological Modeling (205 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (373 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (1.2k citations). Authors at Manomet Conservation Sciences collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and China and have published in prestigious journals including Ornithological Applications, The Auk, Conservation Biology, Forest Ecology and Management and Global Change Biology. Some of Manomet Conservation Sciences's most productive authors include David Dobkin, Hannu T. Huhdanpaa, Nicholas V. L. Brokaw, John M. Hagan, Edwin M. Everham, Shawn Fraver, Richard T. Busing, Andrew A. Whitman, David Clayton Schneider and James C. Williams.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact