United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
Impact in
- Chemical Health and Safety top 5%
-
- Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Papers in
-
- Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure 26
- Air Quality and Health Impacts 17
- Top scholars
- Gregory B. RodgersTreye A. ThomasMichael A. BabichAndrew G. UlsamerN. J. ScheersJoanna M. MathesonGeorge Williams RutherfordRuth A. Brenner
- Journals
- Food and Chemical Toxicology (12 papers)Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health (10 papers)Accident Analysis & Prevention (8 papers)PEDIATRICS (7 papers)Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyGermany
In The Last Decade
United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
254 papers receiving 6.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 185
- Chemical Health and Safety 62
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.1k
- Emergency Medicine 401
- Dermatology 356
- Small Animals 370
Countries citing scholars working at United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Consumer Product Safety Commission. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Consumer Product Safety Commission with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Consumer Product Safety Commission more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Consumer Product Safety Commission at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Consumer Product Safety Commission at the time of their publication.
About United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Consumer Product Safety Commission have published 263 papers, which have received a total of 6.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 61 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 3 papers in Chemical Health and Safety, 23 papers in Small Animals, 25 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and 16 papers in Dermatology on the topics of Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (52 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (32 papers), Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (26 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (23 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (17 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (16 papers), Immunotoxicology and immune responses (15 papers) and Traffic and Road Safety (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Chemical Health and Safety (62 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.1k citations), Emergency Medicine (401 citations), Dermatology (356 citations) and Small Animals (370 citations). Authors at United States Consumer Product Safety Commission collaborate with scholars in United States, Italy and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Food and Chemical Toxicology, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Accident Analysis & Prevention, PEDIATRICS and Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. Some of United States Consumer Product Safety Commission's most productive authors include Gregory B. Rodgers, Treye A. Thomas, Michael A. Babich, Andrew G. Ulsamer, N. J. Scheers, Joanna M. Matheson, George Williams Rutherford, Ruth A. Brenner, Warren Casey and Nicole Kleinstreuer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.