United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
Impact in
- Chemical Health and Safety top 5%
-
- Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Papers in
-
- Air Quality and Health Impacts 26
- Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals 21
- Top scholars
- Gregory B. RodgersTreye ThomasWilliam W. WaltonMichael A. BabichN. J. ScheersJoanna MathesonGeorge W. RutherfordVincent Castranova
- Journals
- Food and Chemical Toxicology (12 papers)Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (11 papers)Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health (10 papers)Accident Analysis & Prevention (8 papers)PEDIATRICS (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyItaly
In The Last Decade
United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
243 papers receiving 6.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
- Chemical Health and Safety 71
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.4k
- Small Animals 478
- Emergency Medicine 484
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 499
Countries citing scholars working at United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Consumer Product Safety Commission. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Consumer Product Safety Commission with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Consumer Product Safety Commission more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Consumer Product Safety Commission at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Consumer Product Safety Commission at the time of their publication.
About United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Consumer Product Safety Commission have published 288 papers, which have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 7 papers in Chemical Health and Safety, 62 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 27 papers in Small Animals, 31 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and 23 papers in Pollution on the topics of Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (30 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (26 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (26 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (24 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (21 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (21 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (19 papers) and Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Chemical Health and Safety (71 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.4k citations), Small Animals (478 citations), Emergency Medicine (484 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (499 citations). Authors at United States Consumer Product Safety Commission collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Food and Chemical Toxicology, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Accident Analysis & Prevention and PEDIATRICS. Some of United States Consumer Product Safety Commission's most productive authors include Gregory B. Rodgers, Treye Thomas, William W. Walton, Michael A. Babich, N. J. Scheers, Joanna Matheson, George W. Rutherford, Vincent Castranova, Warren Casey and Nicole Kleinstreuer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.