Bureau of Medicine and Surgery

7.1k citations
321 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Bureau of Medicine and Surgery

304 papers receiving 7.1k citations

Peers

Bureau of Medicine and Surgery
Comparison fields: 5 of 186
  • Emergency Medicine 340
  • Clinical Psychology 891
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 168
  • Immunology and Allergy 155
  • Parasitology 190
Replace Quality Enhancement Research Initiative with:
Quality Enhancement Research Initiative United States
Robarts Clinical Trials Canada
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute United States
Berkshire Medical Center United States
Lewin Group (United States) United States
Providence Hospital United States
GlaxoSmithKline (Canada) Canada
Bryn Mawr Hospital United States
Waterbury Hospital United States
ECRI Institute United States
Bureau of Medicine and Surgery relative to Quality Enhancement Research Initiative United States Quality Enhancement Research Initiative's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×17.3×
Quality Enhancement Research Initiative · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Bureau of Medicine and Surgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Bureau of Medicine and Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Bureau of Medicine and Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bureau of Medicine and Surgery more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Bureau of Medicine and Surgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Bureau of Medicine and Surgery at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Bureau of Medicine and Surgery at the time of their publication.

About Bureau of Medicine and Surgery

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Bureau of Medicine and Surgery have published 321 papers, which have received a total of 7.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 17 papers in Periodontics, 9 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 12 papers in Emergency Medical Services, 11 papers in Occupational Therapy and 13 papers in Emergency Medicine on the topics of Traumatic Brain Injury Research (13 papers), Dental Health and Care Utilization (13 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (13 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (11 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (9 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (9 papers), Blood transfusion and management (8 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Emergency Medicine (340 citations), Clinical Psychology (891 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (168 citations), Immunology and Allergy (155 citations) and Parasitology (190 citations). Authors at Bureau of Medicine and Surgery collaborate with scholars in United States, Egypt and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Anesthesia & Analgesia, Military Medicine, American Journal of Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Journal of Surgical Research. Some of Bureau of Medicine and Surgery's most productive authors include Jack W. Tsao, Mordecai P. Blaustein, Alexander Y. Shin, David E. Goldman, Kirsten R. Woodward, Patricia E. Lester, William R. Saltzman, Richard T. Jones, John W. Yunginger and John M. Kelso.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact