Central Plantation Crops Research Institute

15.5k citations
1.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Central Plantation Crops Research Institute

915 papers receiving 14.8k citations

Peers

Central Plantation Crops Research Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 191
  • Horticulture 626
  • Food Science 4.0k
  • Plant Science 6.8k
  • Biochemistry 1.0k
  • Biotechnology 1.4k
Replace Central Tuber Crops Research Institute with:
Central Tuber Crops Research Institute India
Indian Institute of Spices Research India
Defence Food Research Laboratory India
Institute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology India
Sugarcane Breeding Institute India
ICAR - Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology India
Institute of Wood Science and Technology India
Indian Institute of Rice Research India
Industrial Technology Institute Sri Lanka
Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology India
Central Plantation Crops Research Institute relative to Central Tuber Crops Research Institute India Central Tuber Crops Research Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Central Tuber Crops Research Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Central Plantation Crops Research Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Central Plantation Crops Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Central Plantation Crops Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Central Plantation Crops Research Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Central Plantation Crops Research Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Central Plantation Crops Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Central Plantation Crops Research Institute at the time of their publication.

About Central Plantation Crops Research Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Central Plantation Crops Research Institute have published 1.0k papers, which have received a total of 15.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 65 papers in Horticulture, 272 papers in Inorganic Chemistry, 527 papers in Plant Science, 183 papers in Food Science and 56 papers in Biochemistry on the topics of Coconut Research and Applications (271 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (87 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (65 papers), Banana Cultivation and Research (56 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (55 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (52 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (50 papers) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (49 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Horticulture (626 citations), Food Science (4.0k citations), Plant Science (6.8k citations), Biochemistry (1.0k citations) and Biotechnology (1.4k citations). Authors at Central Plantation Crops Research Institute collaborate with scholars in India, United States and Türkiye and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Food Process Engineering, Food Control, LWT, Scientia Horticulturae and Journal of Texture Studies. Some of Central Plantation Crops Research Institute's most productive authors include R. Pandiselvam, Anjineyulu Kothakota, Alka Gupta, Murali Gopal, S. V. Ramesh, M. R. Manikantan, George Thomas, K. B. Hebbar, Ravi Bhat and R. Manimekalai.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact