Center for Plant Conservation
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
- Forestry 114
- Forest Ecology and Conservation 94
-
- Plant and animal studies 179
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 104
- Top scholars
- Stuart WageniusAndrea T. KramerNorton H. NickersonDaniel J. LarkinJennifer L. IsonKathryn L. KennedyR. W. RickmanBetty Klepper
- Journals
- Restoration Ecology (23 papers)American Journal of Botany (20 papers)Applications in Plant Sciences (12 papers)International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (11 papers)Phytotaxa (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndonesiaJapan
In The Last Decade
Center for Plant Conservation
886 papers receiving 8.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
- Ecological Modeling 733
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.0k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3.0k
- Plant Science 3.5k
- Forestry 370
Countries citing scholars working at Center for Plant Conservation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Center for Plant Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Center for Plant Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Center for Plant Conservation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Center for Plant Conservation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Center for Plant Conservation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Center for Plant Conservation at the time of their publication.
About Center for Plant Conservation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Center for Plant Conservation have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 9.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 114 papers in Forestry, 314 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 57 papers in Ecological Modeling, 147 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 404 papers in Plant Science on the topics of Plant and animal studies (179 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (132 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (124 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (104 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (103 papers), Forest Ecology and Conservation (94 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (57 papers) and Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques (43 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (733 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.0k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3.0k citations), Plant Science (3.5k citations) and Forestry (370 citations). Authors at Center for Plant Conservation collaborate with scholars in United States, Indonesia and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Restoration Ecology, American Journal of Botany, Applications in Plant Sciences, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules and Phytotaxa. Some of Center for Plant Conservation's most productive authors include Stuart Wagenius, Andrea T. Kramer, Norton H. Nickerson, Daniel J. Larkin, Jennifer L. Ison, Kathryn L. Kennedy, R. W. Rickman, Betty Klepper, G. W. Ankersmit and Peter J. Carrick.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.