Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust

23.3k citations
971 papers ·

Impact in

    • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Ecology top 10%
    • Avian ecology and behavior
    • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation

Papers in

    • Species Distribution and Climate Change 71
    • Avian ecology and behavior 240
    • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 174

Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust

845 papers receiving 21.3k citations

Peers

Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Ecological Modeling 1.8k
  • Ecology 8.9k
  • Developmental Biology 648
  • Small Animals 1.9k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.0k
Replace NHS Highland with:
NHS Highland United Kingdom
Aberdeenshire Council United Kingdom
Bath Spa University United Kingdom
Laboratoire de Biotechnologie et Chimie Marines France
Conservation Leadership Programme United Kingdom
LIttoral ENvironnement et Sociétés France
Natural England United Kingdom
Stress Environnementaux et Biosurveillance des Milieux Aquatiques France
Musée de l'Homme France
Centre d'Écologie et des Sciences de la Conservation France
Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust relative to NHS Highland United Kingdom NHS Highland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
NHS Highland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust at the time of their publication.

About Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust have published 971 papers, which have received a total of 23.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 71 papers in Ecological Modeling, 393 papers in Ecology, 124 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 72 papers in Small Animals and 20 papers in Developmental Biology on the topics of Avian ecology and behavior (240 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (174 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (81 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (71 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (70 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (55 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (52 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (44 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (1.8k citations), Ecology (8.9k citations), Developmental Biology (648 citations), Small Animals (1.9k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.0k citations). Authors at Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Bird Study, Ibis, Veterinary Record, Biological Conservation and Animal Behaviour. Some of Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust's most productive authors include Jeffrey M. Black, Myrfyn Owen, Roger W. Blowey, Sharmila Choudhury, Andrew John Green, Richard Inger, Paul E. Rose, David James Hodgson, Kevin A. Wood and Geoff M. Hilton.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact