Concord Consortium

19.3k citations
823 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Concord Consortium

696 papers receiving 17.2k citations

Peers

Concord Consortium
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Computer Science Applications 902
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.8k
  • Education 2.1k
  • Infectious Diseases 1.0k
  • Biomedical Engineering 2.4k
Replace New England College with:
New England College United States
Cognizant (United States) United States
InterScience (United States) United States
White Plains Hospital United States
St. George's School United States
East Stroudsburg University United States
Kitware (United States) United States
University of Maryland Extension United States
Shepherd University United States
Wentworth Institute of Technology United States
Concord Consortium relative to New England College United States New England College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.8×
New England College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Concord Consortium

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Concord Consortium. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Concord Consortium with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Concord Consortium more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Concord Consortium

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Concord Consortium at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Concord Consortium at the time of their publication.

About Concord Consortium

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Concord Consortium have published 823 papers, which have received a total of 19.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 58 papers in Computer Science Applications, 97 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 8 papers in Architecture, 103 papers in Education and 23 papers in Media Technology on the topics of Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (59 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (47 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (39 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (21 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (18 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (17 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (17 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computer Science Applications (902 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.8k citations), Education (2.1k citations), Infectious Diseases (1.0k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (2.4k citations). Authors at Concord Consortium collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Science Education and Technology, Science, American Journal of Psychiatry, Clinical Therapeutics and International Journal of Science Education. Some of Concord Consortium's most productive authors include Reinhard Blickhan, David Middleton, Pauline M. Austin, J. Jaime, Charles Xie, William W. Walker, Janice D. Gobert, Robert Tinker, Robert F. Martin and Amy Pallant.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact