Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques
Impact in
-
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Neural dynamics and brain function
Papers in
- Philosophy 49
- Linguistics and Discourse Analysis 29
-
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 36
- Embodied and Extended Cognition 32
- Top scholars
- Anne GuénandAssia MouloudiPierre Morizet‐MahoudeauxLingxue YangCharles LenayJohn Robert StewartMalika AuvraySylvain Hanneton
- Journals
- Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (5 papers)Sociologie du Travail (2 papers)New Ideas in Psychology (2 papers)Frontiers in Pharmacology (2 papers)Perception (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques
271 papers receiving 7.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.3k
- Human-Computer Interaction 264
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 549
- Social Psychology 750
- Cultural Studies 192
Countries citing scholars working at Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques at the time of their publication.
About Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques have published 338 papers, which have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 49 papers in Philosophy, 75 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 23 papers in Urban Studies, 18 papers in Human-Computer Interaction and 67 papers in Computer Networks and Communications on the topics of Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts (62 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (38 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (38 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (36 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (32 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (29 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (23 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (264 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (549 citations), Social Psychology (750 citations) and Cultural Studies (192 citations). Authors at Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques collaborate with scholars in France, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, Sociologie du Travail, New Ideas in Psychology, Frontiers in Pharmacology and Perception. Some of Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques's most productive authors include Anne Guénand, Assia Mouloudi, Pierre Morizet‐Mahoudeaux, Lingxue Yang, Charles Lenay, John Robert Stewart, Malika Auvray, Sylvain Hanneton, Clément Mabi and Cecilia Rikap.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.