InterPsy

3.7k citations
520 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

InterPsy

401 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

InterPsy
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Clinical Psychology 952
  • General Psychology 56
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 690
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 436
  • Applied Psychology 150
Replace Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale with:
Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale France
Sigmund Freud Institut Germany
Dynamique des Capacités Humaines et des Conduites de Santé France
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie Germany
Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität - Standort Mailand Italy
Laboratoire d'Anthropologie et de Psychologie Cognitives et Sociales France
Institut catholique de paris France
Association of Child Psychotherapists United Kingdom
Faculty of 1000 (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Connaissance, organisation et systèmes techniques France
InterPsy relative to Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale France Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at InterPsy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at InterPsy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at InterPsy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites InterPsy more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at InterPsy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with InterPsy at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with InterPsy at the time of their publication.

About InterPsy

In recent decades, authors affiliated with InterPsy have published 520 papers, which have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 15 papers in General Psychology, 176 papers in Clinical Psychology, 54 papers in Philosophy, 91 papers in Social Psychology and 20 papers in Applied Psychology on the topics of Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (95 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (42 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (36 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (26 papers), Social Representations and Identity (26 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (24 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (23 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (952 citations), General Psychology (56 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (690 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (436 citations) and Applied Psychology (150 citations). Authors at InterPsy collaborate with scholars in France, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Psychology, L Encéphale, International Journal of Psychophysiology and Frontiers in Psychiatry. Some of InterPsy's most productive authors include Thomas Rabeyron, Jean‐Paul Fischer, Aziz Essadek, Renaud Évrard, Éric Brangier, Joëlle Lighezzolo‐Alnot, Stéphanie Caharel, Jean‐Luc Kop, Christophe Clesse and Youssef Tazouti.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact