Conception de l'Action en Situation
Impact in
-
- Service and Product Innovation
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
-
- Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Papers in
-
- Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences 38
- Marketing 42
- Service and Product Innovation 15
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification 11
- Top scholars
- Sophie PeillonLaure AmbroiseYannick MalevergneArmin SchwienbacherAurélie MerleWided BatatIsabelle Prim‐AllazDidier Sornette
- Journals
- Journal of Business Research (5 papers)Journal of the Association for Information Systems (3 papers)Small Business Economics (2 papers)Value in Health (2 papers)Journal of service management (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceSwitzerlandCanada
In The Last Decade
Conception de l'Action en Situation
236 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Marketing 402
- Management of Technology and Innovation 314
- Strategy and Management 423
- Management Information Systems 213
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 176
Countries citing scholars working at Conception de l'Action en Situation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Conception de l'Action en Situation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Conception de l'Action en Situation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conception de l'Action en Situation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Conception de l'Action en Situation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Conception de l'Action en Situation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Conception de l'Action en Situation at the time of their publication.
About Conception de l'Action en Situation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Conception de l'Action en Situation have published 271 papers, which have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 53 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 42 papers in Marketing, 55 papers in Strategy and Management, 35 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 2 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management on the topics of Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (38 papers), Service and Product Innovation (15 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (13 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability (12 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (11 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (10 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (10 papers) and Firm Innovation and Growth (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Marketing (402 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (314 citations), Strategy and Management (423 citations), Management Information Systems (213 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (176 citations). Authors at Conception de l'Action en Situation collaborate with scholars in France, Switzerland and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Business Research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Small Business Economics, Value in Health and Journal of service management. Some of Conception de l'Action en Situation's most productive authors include Sophie Peillon, Laure Ambroise, Yannick Malevergne, Armin Schwienbacher, Aurélie Merle, Wided Batat, Isabelle Prim‐Allaz, Didier Sornette, В. Ф. Писаренко and Gaël Leboeuf.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.