Embrapa Uva e Vinho
Impact in
- Plant Science top 10%
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
- Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Insect Science top 10%
- Insect behavior and control techniques
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Papers in
- Insect Science 164
- Insect behavior and control techniques 83
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 59
- Research on scale insects 36
- Plant Science 481
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 202
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 67
- Plant Virus Research Studies 56
- Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management 52
- Top scholars
- Marcos BottonJ. ToniettoAlberto MieleAlain CarbonneauLuiz Antenor RizzonG. R. NachtigallGustavo BrunettoMauro Celso Zanus
- Journals
- Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (50 papers)Scientia Horticulturae (23 papers)Food Chemistry (15 papers)Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (12 papers)Journal of Economic Entomology (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Embrapa Uva e Vinho
785 papers receiving 13.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- Plant Science 7.4k
- Insect Science 1.9k
- Food Science 1.4k
- Pollution 738
- Soil Science 825
Countries citing scholars working at Embrapa Uva e Vinho
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Embrapa Uva e Vinho. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Embrapa Uva e Vinho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Embrapa Uva e Vinho more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Embrapa Uva e Vinho
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Embrapa Uva e Vinho at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Embrapa Uva e Vinho at the time of their publication.
About Embrapa Uva e Vinho
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Embrapa Uva e Vinho have published 809 papers, which have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 164 papers in Insect Science, 481 papers in Plant Science, 5 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, 64 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 49 papers in Soil Science on the topics of Horticultural and Viticultural Research (202 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (83 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (67 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (59 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (56 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (55 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (52 papers) and Research on scale insects (36 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Plant Science (7.4k citations), Insect Science (1.9k citations), Food Science (1.4k citations), Pollution (738 citations) and Soil Science (825 citations). Authors at Embrapa Uva e Vinho collaborate with scholars in Brazil, France and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Scientia Horticulturae, Food Chemistry, Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo and Journal of Economic Entomology. Some of Embrapa Uva e Vinho's most productive authors include Marcos Botton, J. Tonietto, Alberto Miele, Alain Carbonneau, Luiz Antenor Rizzon, G. R. Nachtigall, Gustavo Brunetto, Mauro Celso Zanus, Henrique Pessoa dos Santos and G. W. B. de Melo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.