Embrapa Trigo

14.9k citations
844 papers ·

Impact in

  • Soil Science top 10%
    • Soil Management and Crop Yield
    • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
    • Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
    • Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
    • Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food

Papers in

    • Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology 152
    • Weed Control and Herbicide Applications 99
    • Genetics and Plant Breeding 54
    • Soil Management and Crop Yield 78

Embrapa Trigo

800 papers receiving 14.9k citations

Peers

Embrapa Trigo
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Soil Science 2.7k
  • Plant Science 7.3k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.2k
  • Insect Science 1.1k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 809
Replace Embrapa Uva e Vinho with:
Embrapa Uva e Vinho Brazil
Embrapa Meio Ambiente Brazil
Instituto de Fisiología Vegetal Argentina
Comissão Executiva do Plano da Lavoura Cacaueira - Ceplac Brazil
Fundação Estadual de Pesquisa Agropecuária Brazil
Embrapa Gado de Corte Brazil
Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz Brazil
Embrapa Agrobiology Brazil
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste Brazil
Embrapa Digital Agriculture Brazil
Embrapa Trigo relative to Embrapa Uva e Vinho Brazil Embrapa Uva e Vinho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.9×
Embrapa Uva e Vinho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Embrapa Trigo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Embrapa Trigo. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Embrapa Trigo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Embrapa Trigo more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Embrapa Trigo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Embrapa Trigo at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Embrapa Trigo at the time of their publication.

About Embrapa Trigo

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Embrapa Trigo have published 844 papers, which have received a total of 14.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 466 papers in Plant Science, 128 papers in Soil Science, 138 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 71 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 53 papers in Insect Science on the topics of Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (152 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (99 papers), Hemiptera Insect Studies (85 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (78 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (54 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (40 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (38 papers) and Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (30 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Soil Science (2.7k citations), Plant Science (7.3k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.2k citations), Insect Science (1.1k citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (809 citations). Authors at Embrapa Trigo collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, Bragantia, Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo and Plant Disease. Some of Embrapa Trigo's most productive authors include ANTÔNIO RICARDO PANIZZI, H. P. dos Santos, J. M. C. Fernandes, Tiago Lucini, Leandro Várgas, Casiane Salete Tibola, J. E. Denardin, Bruno José Rodrígues Alves, Robert M. Boddey and Segundo Sacramento Urquiaga.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact