Center for Inquiry

17.8k citations
934 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Global Education and Multiculturalism 20
    • Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques 19
    • Education and Technology Integration 17
    • Education Systems and Policy 17

Center for Inquiry

708 papers receiving 14.8k citations

Peers

Center for Inquiry
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Education 3.6k
  • Research and Theory 84
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.3k
  • Communication 666
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 221
Replace Ohio Department of Education with:
Ohio Department of Education United States
State Library of Ohio United States
Chatham University United States
Niagara University United States
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Canada
Ashland University United States
University of Lynchburg United States
Institute for Women's Policy Research United States
Salem State University United States
United States Department of Education United States
Center for Inquiry relative to Ohio Department of Education United States Ohio Department of Education's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Ohio Department of Education · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Center for Inquiry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Center for Inquiry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Center for Inquiry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Center for Inquiry more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Center for Inquiry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Center for Inquiry at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Center for Inquiry at the time of their publication.

About Center for Inquiry

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Center for Inquiry have published 934 papers, which have received a total of 17.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 164 papers in Education, 6 papers in Theoretical Computer Science, 56 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 8 papers in Human Factors and Ergonomics and 126 papers in Sociology and Political Science on the topics of Hearing Impairment and Communication (28 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (23 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (20 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (19 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (19 papers), Education and Technology Integration (17 papers), Education Systems and Policy (17 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Education (3.6k citations), Research and Theory (84 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.3k citations), Communication (666 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (221 citations). Authors at Center for Inquiry collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal, Journal of Neurochemistry, The Anatomical Record, Journal of Experimental Zoology and Biopolymers. Some of Center for Inquiry's most productive authors include Susan L. Robertson, Kim Etherington, RL Sutton-Spence, Merlyna Lim, Torin Monahan, Joan R. Kahn, Leonard I. Pearlin, Ruth Deakin Crick, Sheila Trahar and David L. Altheide.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact