RIKEN Center for Computational Science

96.4k citations
3.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

RIKEN Center for Computational Science

3.0k papers receiving 92.7k citations

Peers

RIKEN Center for Computational Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Developmental Neuroscience 2.8k
  • Molecular Biology 40.5k
  • Cell Biology 8.4k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 8.0k
  • Aging 777
Replace University of Toyama with:
University of Toyama Japan
University of Fukui Japan
Takeda (Japan) Japan
Saitama University Japan
National Institutes of Natural Sciences Japan
Meijo University Japan
Nagoya University Hospital Japan
University of Hyogo Japan
Mitsubishi Group (Japan) Japan
Tokyo University of the Arts Japan
RIKEN Center for Computational Science relative to University of Toyama Japan University of Toyama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Toyama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at RIKEN Center for Computational Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at RIKEN Center for Computational Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at RIKEN Center for Computational Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RIKEN Center for Computational Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at RIKEN Center for Computational Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with RIKEN Center for Computational Science at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with RIKEN Center for Computational Science at the time of their publication.

About RIKEN Center for Computational Science

In recent decades, authors affiliated with RIKEN Center for Computational Science have published 3.3k papers, which have received a total of 96.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 283 papers in Hardware and Architecture, 33 papers in Structural Biology, 322 papers in Atmospheric Science, 220 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 171 papers in Condensed Matter Physics on the topics of Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (276 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (241 papers), Climate variability and models (212 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (200 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (176 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (156 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (153 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (140 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental Neuroscience (2.8k citations), Molecular Biology (40.5k citations), Cell Biology (8.4k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (8.0k citations) and Aging (777 citations). Authors at RIKEN Center for Computational Science collaborate with scholars in Japan, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Physical review. B., The Journal of Chemical Physics, Scientific Reports, Physical review. D and Journal of Computational Chemistry. Some of RIKEN Center for Computational Science's most productive authors include Seiji Yunoki, Shigenobu Yonemura, Yoshiki Sasai, Yuji Sugita, Mototsugu Eiraku, Hitoshi Niwa, Takahito Nakajima, Takemasa Miyoshi, Mohammad Khazaei and Shin‐Ichi Nishikawa.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact