National Institutes of Natural Sciences
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Ion Channels and Receptors
- Inorganic Chemistry top 5%
- Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Papers in
-
- Magnetic confinement fusion research 672
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics 194
-
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics 319
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 313
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 274
- Top scholars
- Donglin JiangMakoto TominagaAkinori NomaHong XuKoichi KatoHitoshi OhtakiTamás RadnaiJia Gao
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (166 papers)Scientific Reports (134 papers)Nuclear Fusion (120 papers)The Journal of Chemical Physics (105 papers)Review of Scientific Instruments (95 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
National Institutes of Natural Sciences
4.9k papers receiving 157.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 223
- Sensory Systems 8.4k
- Inorganic Chemistry 15.6k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 18.8k
- Physiology 4.3k
- Developmental Neuroscience 3.2k
Countries citing scholars working at National Institutes of Natural Sciences
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institutes of Natural Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institutes of Natural Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institutes of Natural Sciences more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Institutes of Natural Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institutes of Natural Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institutes of Natural Sciences at the time of their publication.
About National Institutes of Natural Sciences
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institutes of Natural Sciences have published 5.2k papers, which have received a total of 162.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 795 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 933 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 224 papers in Sensory Systems, 70 papers in Structural Biology and 101 papers in Instrumentation on the topics of Magnetic confinement fusion research (672 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (319 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (313 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (279 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (274 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (194 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (192 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (167 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Sensory Systems (8.4k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (15.6k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (18.8k citations), Physiology (4.3k citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (3.2k citations). Authors at National Institutes of Natural Sciences collaborate with scholars in Japan, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, Scientific Reports, Nuclear Fusion, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Review of Scientific Instruments. Some of National Institutes of Natural Sciences's most productive authors include Donglin Jiang, Makoto Tominaga, Akinori Noma, Hong Xu, Koichi Kato, Hitoshi Ohtaki, Tamás Radnai, Jia Gao, Taisen Iguchi and Yanhong Xu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.