Kaiser Permanente

28.3k papers receiving 1.3M citations

Peers

Kaiser Permanente
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Family Practice 11.7k
  • Oncology 96.9k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 68.4k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 35.2k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 88.6k
Replace VA Palo Alto Health Care System with:
VA Palo Alto Health Care System United States
Oregon Health & Science University United States
University of California San Francisco Medical Center United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center United States
San Francisco General Hospital United States
University of California Davis Medical Center United States
Harbor–UCLA Medical Center United States
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System United States
Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center United States
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles United States
Kaiser Permanente relative to VA Palo Alto Health Care System United States VA Palo Alto Health Care System's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.5×
VA Palo Alto Health Care System · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Kaiser Permanente

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Kaiser Permanente. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Kaiser Permanente with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kaiser Permanente more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Kaiser Permanente

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Kaiser Permanente at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Kaiser Permanente at the time of their publication.

About Kaiser Permanente

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Kaiser Permanente have published 29.8k papers, which have received a total of 1.3M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 279 papers in Family Practice, 951 papers in Health Information Management, 880 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3k papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 2.7k papers in Epidemiology on the topics of Electronic Health Records Systems (497 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (493 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (443 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (391 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (390 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (389 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (342 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (332 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Family Practice (11.7k citations), Oncology (96.9k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (68.4k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (35.2k citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (88.6k citations). Authors at Kaiser Permanente collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PEDIATRICS, JAMA Network Open, Diabetes Care, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Journal of General Internal Medicine. Some of Kaiser Permanente's most productive authors include Alan S. Go, Russell E. Glasgow, Charles Quesenberry Jr, Vincent J. Felitti, GARY D. FRIEDMAN, Bruce B. Ettinger, Robert F. Anda, Gabriel J. Escobar, Joe V. Selby and Arthur L. Klatsky.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact