Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open

44.3k citations
6.9k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
    • Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Surgery top 5%
    • Breast Implant and Reconstruction
    • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
    • Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
    • Body Contouring and Surgery

Papers in

  • Surgery 3.8k
    • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 1.4k
    • Breast Implant and Reconstruction 991
    • Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques 606
    • Body Contouring and Surgery 391
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 292
    • Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques 423

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open

5.1k papers receiving 37.5k citations

Peers

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
  • Dermatology 5.1k
  • Surgery 21.7k
  • Rehabilitation 2.5k
  • Health Informatics 425
  • Transplantation 422
Replace ANZ Journal of Surgery with:
ANZ Journal of Surgery Australia
Aesthetic Surgery Journal United States
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery United Kingdom
Trials United Kingdom
The American Surgeon United States
Journal of Korean Medical Science South Korea
International Journal of Surgery China
Medicina Romania
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery United Kingdom
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery United States
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open relative to ANZ Journal of Surgery Australia ANZ Journal of Surgery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
ANZ Journal of Surgery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open.

About Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open

The 6.9k papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open in the last decades have received a total of 44.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open usually cover Surgery (3.8k papers), Dermatology (697 papers), Rehabilitation (308 papers), Transplantation (102 papers) and Gender Studies (308 papers) specifically the topics of Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (1.4k papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (991 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (606 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (423 papers), Body Contouring and Surgery (391 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (318 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (306 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (292 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open are Eric Swanson, Jeffrey E. Janis, Rod J. Rohrich, Rei Ogawa, Maurice Y. Nahabedian, Donald H. Lalonde, Kyle R. Eberlin, Sumeet S. Teotia, Jordan D. Frey and Nolan S. Karp.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact