Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica

278 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Peers

Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
  • Health Information Management 284
  • Molecular Medicine 153
  • Management Information Systems 235
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 283
  • Instrumentation 64
Replace Esteve (Spain) with:
Esteve (Spain) Spain
XLAB (Slovenia) Slovenia
FIT Consulting (Italy) Italy
Network Group (Czechia) Czechia
Catholic University College of Bruges–Ostend Belgium
Ferioli & Gianotti (Italy) Italy
Digital Catapult United Kingdom
CSL (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Baxter (Germany) Germany
PA Consulting Group United Kingdom
Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica relative to Esteve (Spain) Spain Esteve (Spain)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×21.3×
Esteve (Spain) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica at the time of their publication.

About Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica have published 297 papers, which have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1 paper in Medical Terminology, 15 papers in Health Information Management, 6 papers in Instrumentation, 15 papers in Management Information Systems and 38 papers in Computer Networks and Communications on the topics of Semantic Web and Ontologies (16 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (15 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (14 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (12 papers), Advanced Control Systems Optimization (11 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (11 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (9 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health Information Management (284 citations), Molecular Medicine (153 citations), Management Information Systems (235 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (283 citations) and Instrumentation (64 citations). Authors at Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica collaborate with scholars in Italy, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Molecular BioSystems, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Methods of Information in Medicine and Faraday Discussions. Some of Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica's most productive authors include Mario Stefanelli, Silvana Quaglini, Silvia Panzarasa, Paolo Rocco, Dario Farina, Roberto Merletti, Luca Mesin, Nicolino Ruperto, Sergio Matteo Savaresi and Andrea Maria Zanchettin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact