Digital Catapult

18.4k citations
785 papers ·

Impact in

    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Retinal and Optic Conditions
    • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders

Papers in

Digital Catapult

686 papers receiving 17.9k citations

Peers

Digital Catapult
Comparison fields: 5 of 239
  • Ophthalmology 1.2k
  • Genetics 1.2k
  • Public Administration 342
  • Hematology 1.0k
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.7k
Replace Newcastle College with:
Newcastle College United Kingdom
Edwards (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
21c Consultancy (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Richard Wolf (Germany) Germany
St Michael’s Hospital United Kingdom
Smith Institute United Kingdom
Sutton Hospital United Kingdom
St Michael's Hospital United Kingdom
Faculty of 1000 (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Worthing Hospital United Kingdom
Digital Catapult relative to Newcastle College United Kingdom Newcastle College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Newcastle College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Digital Catapult

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Digital Catapult. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Digital Catapult with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Digital Catapult more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Digital Catapult

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Digital Catapult at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Digital Catapult at the time of their publication.

About Digital Catapult

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Digital Catapult have published 785 papers, which have received a total of 18.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 57 papers in Ophthalmology, 14 papers in Public Administration, 90 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 125 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 64 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging on the topics of Retinal Diseases and Treatments (46 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (43 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (31 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (27 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (25 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (18 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (17 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology (1.2k citations), Genetics (1.2k citations), Public Administration (342 citations), Hematology (1.0k citations) and Political Science and International Relations (1.7k citations). Authors at Digital Catapult collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, Journal of European Public Policy, Evolution, Intelligence & National Security and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. Some of Digital Catapult's most productive authors include Bernadette Modell, Julia Brannen, Barbara A. Wilson, David Coen, Andrew Turner, Luke Holmes, Jonathan J. Evans, Claudio M. Radaelli, Jano van Hemert and Geoffrey Bellingan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact