Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

114.5k citations
6.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

5.3k papers receiving 106.9k citations

Peers

Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Paleontology 5.4k
  • Economics and Econometrics 18.9k
  • Geography, Planning and Development 3.7k
  • Environmental Engineering 6.6k
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 6.9k
Replace Renmin University of China with:
Renmin University of China China
Beijing Normal University China
University of Seoul South Korea
Hong Kong Baptist University Hong Kong
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies South Korea
Hong Kong Metropolitan University Hong Kong
Tamkang University Taiwan
Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research China
E Ink (South Korea) South Korea
Kwansei Gakuin University Japan
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences relative to Renmin University of China China Renmin University of China's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Renmin University of China · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Chinese Academy of Social Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Academy of Social Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Chinese Academy of Social Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Chinese Academy of Social Sciences at the time of their publication.

About Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Chinese Academy of Social Sciences have published 6.9k papers, which have received a total of 114.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.2k papers in Economics and Econometrics, 341 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 242 papers in Paleontology, 171 papers in Geography, Planning and Development and 263 papers in Finance on the topics of Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (378 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (276 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (232 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (230 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (214 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (173 papers), Global trade and economics (162 papers) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (154 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (5.4k citations), Economics and Econometrics (18.9k citations), Geography, Planning and Development (3.7k citations), Environmental Engineering (6.6k citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (6.9k citations). Authors at Chinese Academy of Social Sciences collaborate with scholars in China, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including China & World Economy, Sustainability, China Economic Review, Journal of Cleaner Production and Finance research letters. Some of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences's most productive authors include Shaojun Guo, ZhongXiang Zhang, Erkang Wang, Shaojun Dong, Youguo Zhang, Zhijun Zhao, Yun-Song Piao, Shi Li, Xingcan Chen and Jiahua Pan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact