China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

252.7k citations
15.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

14.4k papers receiving 252.6k citations

Peers

China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 52.5k
  • Drug Discovery 455
  • Neurology 7.7k
  • Molecular Biology 54.8k
  • Pharmacology 10.9k
Replace Beijing University of Chinese Medicine with:
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine China
Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine China
Tianjin Medical University China
Institute of Chinese Materia Medica
Hebei Medical University China
Dalian Medical University China
Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine China
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine China
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University China
China Pharmaceutical University China
China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences relative to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine China Beijing University of Chinese Medicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences at the time of their publication.

About China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences have published 15.8k papers, which have received a total of 252.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5.3k papers in Complementary and alternative medicine, 420 papers in Neurology, 2.8k papers in Molecular Biology, 408 papers in Pharmacology and 617 papers in Pharmacology on the topics of Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (2.2k papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (1.2k papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (1.2k papers), Medical Research and Treatments (1.2k papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (470 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (398 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (337 papers) and Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications (298 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Complementary and alternative medicine (52.5k citations), Drug Discovery (455 citations), Neurology (7.7k citations), Molecular Biology (54.8k citations) and Pharmacology (10.9k citations). Authors at China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Hong Kong and have published in prestigious journals including Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, Journal of Ethnopharmacology and Scientific Reports. Some of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences's most productive authors include Youyou Tu, Luqi Huang, Luqi Huang, Shilin Chen, Jie Wang, Keji Chen, Aiping Lü, Lanping Guo, Wanzhu Bai and Tsutomu Hashikawa.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact