China Pharmaceutical University

624.6k citations
26.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

China Pharmaceutical University

23.2k papers receiving 561.4k citations

Peers

China Pharmaceutical University
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Pharmacology 39.6k
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 34.2k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 23.8k
  • Biomaterials 49.6k
  • Molecular Biology 240.9k
Replace Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica with:
Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica China
Nanjing Medical University China
Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine China
Second Military Medical University China
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine China
Wenzhou Medical University China
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology China
Anhui Medical University China
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University China
Dalian Medical University China
China Pharmaceutical University relative to Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica China Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at China Pharmaceutical University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at China Pharmaceutical University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at China Pharmaceutical University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites China Pharmaceutical University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at China Pharmaceutical University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with China Pharmaceutical University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with China Pharmaceutical University at the time of their publication.

About China Pharmaceutical University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with China Pharmaceutical University have published 26.5k papers, which have received a total of 624.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.1k papers in Pharmacology, 1.8k papers in Complementary and alternative medicine, 11.0k papers in Molecular Biology, 2.3k papers in Pharmacology and 816 papers in Pharmaceutical Science on the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (1.6k papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (1.1k papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (976 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (955 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (879 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (866 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (804 papers) and Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (772 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pharmacology (39.6k citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (34.2k citations), Pharmaceutical Science (23.8k citations), Biomaterials (49.6k citations) and Molecular Biology (240.9k citations). Authors at China Pharmaceutical University collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Hong Kong and have published in prestigious journals including European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis and Journal of Ethnopharmacology. Some of China Pharmaceutical University's most productive authors include Ping Li, Guangji Wang, Qidong You, Ling‐Yi Kong, Luyong Zhang, Boyang Yu, Qineng Ping, Lian‐Wen Qi, Haiping Hao and Yueqing Gu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact