Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

274.2k citations
18.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

16.6k papers receiving 274k citations

Peers

Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 54k
  • Drug Discovery 725
  • Neurology 7k
  • Pharmacology 8.2k
  • Pharmacology 12.7k
Replace China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences with:
China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences China
Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine China
Tianjin Medical University China
Dalian Medical University China
Hebei Medical University China
Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine China
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine China
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University China
Shenyang Pharmaceutical University China
China Medical University China
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine relative to China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences China China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Beijing University of Chinese Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beijing University of Chinese Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Beijing University of Chinese Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Beijing University of Chinese Medicine at the time of their publication.

About Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Beijing University of Chinese Medicine have published 18.2k papers, which have received a total of 274.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5.8k papers in Complementary and alternative medicine, 567 papers in Pharmacology, 534 papers in Nephrology, 409 papers in Neurology and 15 papers in Drug Discovery on the topics of Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (2.1k papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (1.5k papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (1.3k papers), Medical Research and Treatments (1.2k papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (603 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (417 papers), Gut microbiota and health (381 papers) and Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (282 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Complementary and alternative medicine (54k citations), Drug Discovery (725 citations), Neurology (7k citations), Pharmacology (8.2k citations) and Pharmacology (12.7k citations). Authors at Beijing University of Chinese Medicine collaborate with scholars in China, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Medicine and Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine. Some of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine's most productive authors include Jianping Liu, Pengfei Tu, Jian Ni, Yanjiang Qiao, Xingbin Yin, Hongcai Shang, Jun Li, Jiaxu Chen, Dongwei Zhang and Xiaoxv Dong.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact