BioClinica (United States)

10.0k citations
365 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

BioClinica (United States)

298 papers receiving 8.2k citations

Peers

BioClinica (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
  • Rheumatology 1.5k
  • Biological Psychiatry 144
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 411
  • Physiology 1.2k
  • Oncology 1.1k
Replace National Multiple Sclerosis Society with:
National Multiple Sclerosis Society United States
Gorgias Press (United States) United States
Strang Cancer Prevention Institute United States
Inflammation Research Foundation United States
Angiogenesis Foundation United States
Acceleron Pharma (United States) United States
Eli Lilly (Canada) Canada
W. Alton Jones Cell Science Center United States
New York Oncology Hematology United States
New York Stem Cell Foundation United States
BioClinica (United States) relative to National Multiple Sclerosis Society United States National Multiple Sclerosis Society's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
National Multiple Sclerosis Society · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at BioClinica (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at BioClinica (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at BioClinica (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BioClinica (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at BioClinica (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with BioClinica (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with BioClinica (United States) at the time of their publication.

About BioClinica (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with BioClinica (United States) have published 365 papers, which have received a total of 10.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 48 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 16 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 23 papers in Rheumatology, 2 papers in Equine and 17 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health on the topics of Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (16 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (15 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (14 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (11 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (10 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Rheumatology (1.5k citations), Biological Psychiatry (144 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (411 citations), Physiology (1.2k citations) and Oncology (1.1k citations). Authors at BioClinica (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and France and have published in prestigious journals including Alzheimer s & Dementia, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Biotechnology Progress and RSC Advances. Some of BioClinica (United States)'s most productive authors include Donghui Zhang, Colin G. Miller, Pieter B.M.W.M. Timmermans, Zbigniew J. Pietrzkowski, Boris V. Nemzer, Joyce Suhy, Steven G. Einstein, Derk D. Purcell, Jerome A. Barakos and Sławomir Wybraniec.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact