Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée
Impact in
-
- University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Intellectual Property and Patents
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Papers in
-
- Economic Growth and Productivity 93
- Economic Theory and Institutions 69
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 69
- Economic theories and models 57
-
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact 115
- Top scholars
- Marcus WagnerPatrick Serge CohendetMarkus C. BeckerSuresh P. SethiPatrick LlerenaRobin CowanAsh AminNicolas Carayol Φ
In The Last Decade
Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée
1.8k papers receiving 39.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
- Management of Technology and Innovation 5.9k
- Strategy and Management 8.4k
- Marketing 3.2k
- Economics and Econometrics 8.1k
- Development 870
Countries citing scholars working at Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée at the time of their publication.
About Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée have published 2k papers, which have received a total of 39.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 647 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 198 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 163 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 296 papers in Strategy and Management and 110 papers in Finance on the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (188 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (115 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (93 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (71 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (69 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (69 papers), Economic theories and models (57 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (56 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management of Technology and Innovation (5.9k citations), Strategy and Management (8.4k citations), Marketing (3.2k citations), Economics and Econometrics (8.1k citations) and Development (870 citations). Authors at Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée collaborate with scholars in France, Germany and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Research Policy, Ecological Economics, Economic Modelling, Economics of Innovation and New Technology and Journal of Evolutionary Economics. Some of Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée's most productive authors include Marcus Wagner, Patrick Serge Cohendet, Markus C. Becker, Suresh P. Sethi, Patrick Llerena, Robin Cowan, Ash Amin, Nicolas Carayol Φ, Stefan Schaltegger and Nicolas Jonard.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.