Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

10.8k citations
279 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

215 papers receiving 7.4k citations

Peers

Blue Cross Blue Shield Association
Comparison fields: 5 of 200
  • Hematology 1.2k
  • General Health Professions 1.3k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.3k
  • Oncology 964
  • Family Practice 63
Replace American Society for Clinical Pathology with:
American Society for Clinical Pathology United States
ProHealth Care United States
McLaren Greater Lansing United States
Anthem (United States) United States
Munson Medical Center United States
Missouri Heart Center United States
Ontario Clinical Oncology Group Canada
Missouri Baptist Medical Center United States
Bethesda North Hospital United States
North Memorial Medical Center United States
Blue Cross Blue Shield Association relative to American Society for Clinical Pathology United States American Society for Clinical Pathology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
American Society for Clinical Pathology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Blue Cross Blue Shield Association. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Blue Cross Blue Shield Association with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Blue Cross Blue Shield Association more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Blue Cross Blue Shield Association at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Blue Cross Blue Shield Association at the time of their publication.

About Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Blue Cross Blue Shield Association have published 279 papers, which have received a total of 10.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1 paper in Medical Terminology, 63 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 49 papers in General Health Professions, 9 papers in Pharmacy and 3 papers in Family Practice on the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (40 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (27 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (19 papers), Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment (10 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (9 papers), Global Health Care Issues (8 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (7 papers) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (7 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Hematology (1.2k citations), General Health Professions (1.3k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.3k citations), Oncology (964 citations) and Family Practice (63 citations). Authors at Blue Cross Blue Shield Association collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Health Affairs, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy and Journal of the American College of Radiology. Some of Blue Cross Blue Shield Association's most productive authors include Naomi Aronson, Jerome Seidenfeld, Margaret Piper, David J Samson, F. Lefèvre, Timothy J Wilt, Benjamin Djulbegović, Charles L. Bennett, David Share and Glenn E. Palomaki.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact