Birkbeck, University of London

814.4k citations
21.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Birkbeck, University of London

18.9k papers receiving 752.6k citations

Peers

Birkbeck, University of London
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 108.9k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 52.2k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 50.8k
  • Geophysics 36.3k
  • Social Psychology 51.9k
Replace University of Reading with:
University of Reading United Kingdom
University of Warwick United Kingdom
University of Sussex United Kingdom
University of York United Kingdom
University of Exeter United Kingdom
Lancaster University United Kingdom
Durham University United Kingdom
University of Surrey United Kingdom
University of Leicester United Kingdom
Leiden University Netherlands
Birkbeck, University of London relative to University of Reading United Kingdom University of Reading's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
University of Reading · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Birkbeck, University of London

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Birkbeck, University of London. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Birkbeck, University of London with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birkbeck, University of London more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Birkbeck, University of London

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London at the time of their publication.

About Birkbeck, University of London

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London have published 21.8k papers, which have received a total of 814.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.2k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 1.1k papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 995 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 832 papers in Geophysics and 78 papers in Structural Biology on the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (607 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (605 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (534 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (514 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (469 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (465 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (420 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (406 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cognitive Neuroscience (108.9k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (52.2k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (50.8k citations), Geophysics (36.3k citations) and Social Psychology (51.9k citations). Authors at Birkbeck, University of London collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Nature, Journal of Molecular Biology, PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology and Scientific Reports. Some of Birkbeck, University of London's most productive authors include Janet M. Thornton, Tom L. Blundell, Mark H. Johnson, Jean‐Marc Dewaele, Ron Smith, Andrej Šali, Jay Belsky, David R. Cox, Martin Eimer and George E. P. Box.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact