Allegheny-Singer Research Institute

46.8k citations
780 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Allegheny-Singer Research Institute

754 papers receiving 46.8k citations

Peers

Allegheny-Singer Research Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 221
  • Otorhinolaryngology 1.3k
  • Molecular Biology 12.9k
  • Microbiology 1.2k
  • Virology 693
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.2k
Replace Erie County Medical Center with:
Erie County Medical Center United States
James H. Quillen VA Medical Center United States
City of Boston United States
Lawson Research Institute Canada
Quest Diagnostics (United States) United States
Golisano Children's Hospital United States
McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre Canada
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health United States
Greater Baltimore Medical Center United States
Becton Dickinson (United States) United States
Allegheny-Singer Research Institute relative to Erie County Medical Center United States Erie County Medical Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40.8×
Erie County Medical Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Allegheny-Singer Research Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Allegheny-Singer Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Allegheny-Singer Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allegheny-Singer Research Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Allegheny-Singer Research Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Allegheny-Singer Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Allegheny-Singer Research Institute at the time of their publication.

About Allegheny-Singer Research Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Allegheny-Singer Research Institute have published 780 papers, which have received a total of 46.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 63 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 130 papers in Surgery, 19 papers in Microbiology, 8 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience and 39 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine on the topics of Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (76 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (60 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (31 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (25 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (22 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (21 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (20 papers) and Epilepsy research and treatment (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Otorhinolaryngology (1.3k citations), Molecular Biology (12.9k citations), Microbiology (1.2k citations), Virology (693 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.2k citations). Authors at Allegheny-Singer Research Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Behavioral Education, PLoS ONE, Journal of Early Intervention and Exceptional Children. Some of Allegheny-Singer Research Institute's most productive authors include Paul Stoodley, John William Costerton, Luanne Hall‐Stoodley, Garth D. Ehrlich, Mark E. Shirtliff, Philip S. Stewart, Mark R. Wolery, Christoph A. Fux, James Christopher Post and Fen Ze Hu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact