Alliance for Safe Kids

37.8k citations
540 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Alliance for Safe Kids

474 papers receiving 35.1k citations

Peers

Alliance for Safe Kids
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 9.6k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 2.6k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 3.9k
  • Organic Chemistry 5.3k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 3.4k
Replace Xerox (Canada) with:
Xerox (Canada) Canada
CECOM Software Engineering Center United States
D. E. Shaw Research United States
Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center United States
Regroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe Canada
ARCH Development Corporation United States
National Institute of General Medical Sciences United States
United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research United States
New York Structural Biology Center United States
Joint Institute for Computational Sciences United States
Alliance for Safe Kids relative to Xerox (Canada) Canada Xerox (Canada)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Xerox (Canada) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Alliance for Safe Kids

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Alliance for Safe Kids. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Alliance for Safe Kids with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alliance for Safe Kids more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Alliance for Safe Kids

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Alliance for Safe Kids at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Alliance for Safe Kids at the time of their publication.

About Alliance for Safe Kids

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Alliance for Safe Kids have published 540 papers, which have received a total of 37.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4 papers in Structural Biology, 44 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics, 18 papers in Hardware and Architecture, 78 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 128 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering on the topics of Semiconductor materials and devices (38 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (22 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (15 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (14 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (13 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (13 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (13 papers) and Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (9.6k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (2.6k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (3.9k citations), Organic Chemistry (5.3k citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (3.4k citations). Authors at Alliance for Safe Kids collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Proceedings of the IEEE, Nanoscale, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Solid State Communications and Journal of Chromatography A. Some of Alliance for Safe Kids's most productive authors include L. Wilk, Marwan Nusair, S. H. Vosko, Lewis M. Terman, M. C. Jones, Simon J. Sheather, Dexter Kozen, G. Tesauro, John E. A. Bertram and R. E. Kalman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact