Joint Institute for Computational Sciences
Impact in
-
- Nuclear physics research studies
- Astronomical and nuclear sciences
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
-
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Atomic and Molecular Physics
Papers in
-
- Nuclear physics research studies 215
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 78
- Astronomical and nuclear sciences 49
- Radiation 71
- Nuclear Physics and Applications 57
- Top scholars
- W. NazarewiczThom H. DunningT. EgamiKirk A. PetersonMahshid AhmadiJ. DobaczewskiAriana BesteBin Hu
- Journals
- Nuclear Physics A (39 papers)Physical Review Letters (33 papers)Physics Letters B (21 papers)Physical review. B. (17 papers)The European Physical Journal A (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaPoland
In The Last Decade
Joint Institute for Computational Sciences
747 papers receiving 28.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 206
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 8.6k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 7.2k
- Radiation 1.8k
- Condensed Matter Physics 2.1k
- Materials Chemistry 6.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Joint Institute for Computational Sciences
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Joint Institute for Computational Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Joint Institute for Computational Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joint Institute for Computational Sciences more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Joint Institute for Computational Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Joint Institute for Computational Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Joint Institute for Computational Sciences at the time of their publication.
About Joint Institute for Computational Sciences
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Joint Institute for Computational Sciences have published 774 papers, which have received a total of 29.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 244 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 71 papers in Radiation, 90 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 203 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 160 papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Nuclear physics research studies (215 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (78 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (72 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (57 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (57 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (49 papers), Perovskite Materials and Applications (45 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (37 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (8.6k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (7.2k citations), Radiation (1.8k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (2.1k citations) and Materials Chemistry (6.8k citations). Authors at Joint Institute for Computational Sciences collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Poland and have published in prestigious journals including Nuclear Physics A, Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B, Physical review. B. and The European Physical Journal A. Some of Joint Institute for Computational Sciences's most productive authors include W. Nazarewicz, Thom H. Dunning, T. Egami, Kirk A. Peterson, Mahshid Ahmadi, J. Dobaczewski, Ariana Beste, Bin Hu, Takuya Iwashita and Ting Wu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.