H. Weinstock

1.2k citations
52 papers · 949 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

H. Weinstock

48 papers receiving 891 citations

Peers

H. Weinstock
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Condensed Matter Physics 331
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 393
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 193
  • Geophysics 93
  • Structural Biology 8
Replace W. van Haeringen with:
W. van Haeringen Netherlands
Hideo Itozaki Japan
L. Fritzsch Germany
L. G. Rubin United States
R.L. Fagaly United States
P. Leiderer Germany
E. Dantsker United States
Yoshihide Yoshimoto Japan
Y. T. Millev Germany
T. Schurig Germany
H. Weinstock relative to W. van Haeringen Netherlands W. van Haeringen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
W. van Haeringen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Weinstock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Weinstock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Weinstock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Weinstock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Weinstock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Weinstock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Weinstock. The network helps show where H. Weinstock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Weinstock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Weinstock Line = papers co-authored together H. Weinstock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996290
2 195999
3 199182
4 200039
5 198138
6 198533
7 198624
8 197423
9 199522
10 197821
11 198920
12 197420
13 200116
14 199316
15 196214
16 197314
17 197613
18 199313
19 197112
20 197811

About H. Weinstock

H. Weinstock is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics, Mechanical Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 52 papers that have together received 949 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic Properties and Applications (9 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (8 papers), Non-Destructive Testing Techniques (8 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (8 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (6 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (5 papers), Thermal properties of materials (5 papers) and Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (331 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (393 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (193 citations), Geophysics (93 citations) and Structural Biology (8 citations). H. Weinstock has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include M. Moss, Robert L. Sproull, M. Nisenoff, T. Erber, Alfred Bork, D.S. Kupperman, W. C. Overton, J. J. Vuillemin, R. E. Dietz and T.Y. Hsiang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, Cryogenics and Solid State Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact