Endothelial dysfunction: cardiovascular risk factors, therapy, and outcome.
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Cornelia S CarrJassim Al Suwaidi
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w89368944 →Countries where authors are citing Endothelial dysfunction: cardiovascular risk factors, therapy, and outcome.
This map shows the geographic impact of Endothelial dysfunction: cardiovascular risk factors, therapy, and outcome.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Endothelial dysfunction: cardiovascular risk factors, therapy, and outcome. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Endothelial dysfunction: cardiovascular risk factors, therapy, and outcome. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Endothelial dysfunction: cardiovascular risk factors, therapy, and outcome.
This network shows the impact of Endothelial dysfunction: cardiovascular risk factors, therapy, and outcome.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Endothelial dysfunction: cardiovascular risk factors, therapy, and outcome..
About Endothelial dysfunction: cardiovascular risk factors, therapy, and outcome.
This paper, published in 2005, received 665 indexed citations . Written by Cornelia S Carr and Jassim Al Suwaidi covering the research area of Physiology, Biochemistry and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (156 citations), Molecular Biology (134 citations), Physiology (108 citations), Immunology (78 citations) and Surgery (75 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w89368944.