Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History *
Impact in
- Demography 439
Classified as
- Authors
- Sascha O. BeckerLudger Woessmann
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.531 →Countries where authors are citing Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History *
This map shows the geographic impact of Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History *. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History * with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History * more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History *
This network shows the impact of Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History *. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History *.
About Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History *
This paper, published in 2009, received 652 indexed citations . Written by Sascha O. Becker and Ludger Woessmann covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Demography. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Demography (439 citations), Sociology and Political Science (362 citations), Economics and Econometrics (252 citations), Accounting (76 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (57 citations). Published in The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.531.