Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items

601 indexed citations
published 1994
Journal
View

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w85609271 →

Countries where authors are citing Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items.

About Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items

This paper, published in 1994, received 601 indexed citations . Written by Gregory Camilli and Lorrie A. Shepard. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Science and Operations Research (311 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (138 citations), Education (134 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (115 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (104 citations). Published in View.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w85609271.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact