Perspectives on the Development of Memory and Cognition

675 indexed citations
published 1977
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w77814403 →

Countries where authors are citing Perspectives on the Development of Memory and Cognition

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Perspectives on the Development of Memory and Cognition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Perspectives on the Development of Memory and Cognition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Perspectives on the Development of Memory and Cognition more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Perspectives on the Development of Memory and Cognition

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Perspectives on the Development of Memory and Cognition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Perspectives on the Development of Memory and Cognition.

About Perspectives on the Development of Memory and Cognition

This paper, published in 1977, received 675 indexed citations . Written by Robert V. Kail and John W. Hagen. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (478 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (246 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (175 citations), Education (164 citations) and Statistics and Probability (66 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w77814403.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact