Timber management: a quantitative approach.
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Andalas University Repository (Andalas University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4078004 →Countries where authors are citing Timber management: a quantitative approach.
This map shows the geographic impact of Timber management: a quantitative approach.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timber management: a quantitative approach. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timber management: a quantitative approach. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Timber management: a quantitative approach.
This network shows the impact of Timber management: a quantitative approach.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Timber management: a quantitative approach..
About Timber management: a quantitative approach.
This paper, published in 1983, received 675 indexed citations . Written by Jerome L. Clutter, James C. Fortson, L. V. Pienaar, G. H. Brister and Robert L. Bailey covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (610 citations), Global and Planetary Change (384 citations), Environmental Engineering (234 citations), Mechanical Engineering (166 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (69 citations). Published in Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4078004.