Inhibition of apoptosis during development of colorectal cancer.
Impact in
- Oncology 201
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w73375813 →Countries where authors are citing Inhibition of apoptosis during development of colorectal cancer.
This map shows the geographic impact of Inhibition of apoptosis during development of colorectal cancer.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inhibition of apoptosis during development of colorectal cancer. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inhibition of apoptosis during development of colorectal cancer. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Inhibition of apoptosis during development of colorectal cancer.
This network shows the impact of Inhibition of apoptosis during development of colorectal cancer.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Inhibition of apoptosis during development of colorectal cancer..
About Inhibition of apoptosis during development of colorectal cancer.
This paper, published in 1995, received 501 indexed citations . Written by A Bedi, Pankaj J. Pasricha, Adil Akhtar, James Barber, Gauri C. Bedi, Francis M. Giardiello, Barbara A. Zehnbauer, Stanley R. Hamilton and Richard J. Jones covering the research area of Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (219 citations), Oncology (201 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (108 citations), Cancer Research (95 citations) and Pharmacology (80 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w73375813.