The Netherlands: health system review.
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w66469331 →Countries where authors are citing The Netherlands: health system review.
This map shows the geographic impact of The Netherlands: health system review.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Netherlands: health system review. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Netherlands: health system review. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Netherlands: health system review.
This network shows the impact of The Netherlands: health system review.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Netherlands: health system review..
About The Netherlands: health system review.
This paper, published in 2010, received 488 indexed citations . Written by Willemijn Schäfer, Madelon Kroneman, W.G.W. Boerma, M. van den Berg, G.P. Westert, W. Devillé and Ewout van Ginneken covering the research area of General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (277 citations), Economics and Econometrics (188 citations), Epidemiology (71 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (54 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (44 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w66469331.