Human Scale Development Conception Application and Further Reflections
Impact in
- Authors
- Manfred Max‐Neef
- Journal
- Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w62821949 →Countries where authors are citing Human Scale Development Conception Application and Further Reflections
This map shows the geographic impact of Human Scale Development Conception Application and Further Reflections. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Human Scale Development Conception Application and Further Reflections with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Scale Development Conception Application and Further Reflections more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Human Scale Development Conception Application and Further Reflections
This network shows the impact of Human Scale Development Conception Application and Further Reflections. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Human Scale Development Conception Application and Further Reflections.
About Human Scale Development Conception Application and Further Reflections
This paper, published in 1989, received 563 indexed citations . Written by Manfred Max‐Neef. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (162 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (113 citations), Global and Planetary Change (66 citations), Economics and Econometrics (63 citations) and General Health Professions (62 citations). Published in Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w62821949.