Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma

695 indexed citations
published 1996
Journal
eScholarship (California Digital Library)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w5906512 →

Countries where authors are citing Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma.

About Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma

This paper, published in 1996, received 695 indexed citations . Written by Arend Lijphart covering the research area of Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (586 citations), Sociology and Political Science (230 citations), Communication (139 citations), Economics and Econometrics (136 citations) and Gender Studies (103 citations). Published in eScholarship (California Digital Library).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w5906512.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact