Prevention of Arthritis by Interleukin 10–producing B Cells
Impact in
- Immunology 532
- Rheumatology 78
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1084/jem.20021293 →Countries where authors are citing Prevention of Arthritis by Interleukin 10–producing B Cells
This map shows the geographic impact of Prevention of Arthritis by Interleukin 10–producing B Cells. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Prevention of Arthritis by Interleukin 10–producing B Cells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prevention of Arthritis by Interleukin 10–producing B Cells more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Prevention of Arthritis by Interleukin 10–producing B Cells
This network shows the impact of Prevention of Arthritis by Interleukin 10–producing B Cells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Prevention of Arthritis by Interleukin 10–producing B Cells.
About Prevention of Arthritis by Interleukin 10–producing B Cells
This paper, published in 2003, received 727 indexed citations . Written by Claudia Mauri, David C. Gray, Naseem Mushtaq and Marco Londei covering the research area of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Immunology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Immunology (532 citations), Rheumatology (78 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (67 citations), Oncology (56 citations) and Genetics (56 citations). Published in The Journal of Experimental Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1084/jem.20021293.